Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Yi-1.5-34B

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 87.9% for Qwen3.7 Plus and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)01.AI
Noometry Index45.030.2
Released2026-06-022024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$1.60—
Results tracked3221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding14731169
FrontierCode10.2%—
SciCode45.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
OSWorld 2.02.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14601160
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
CritPt9.1%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench84%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index147.39—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14671182
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)34.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond87.9%32%
LMArena Expert14671144

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1281—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14451121
LMArena Chinese15101213
LMArena French14711155
LMArena German14711111
LMArena Japanese14111021
LMArena Korean14161005
LMArena Russian14571091
LMArena Spanish14531120

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14391139

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14541144

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14541173
LMArena Creative Writing14391135
LMArena Multi-Turn14591153

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Plus and Yi-1.5-34B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Plus has 32 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper