Noometry

Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.3 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.845.3
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding10461473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts10321460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math10561466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English10111445
LMArena Chinese9761510
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following10281440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query10131455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text10661455
LMArena Creative Writing10321439
LMArena Multi-Turn10151460

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper