Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 36.3.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
Granite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.445.3
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding13611473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts13061460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LMArena Math—1466

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert13151467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12681445
LMArena Chinese12691510
LMArena Russian12491457
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12731440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query12911455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text12931455
LMArena Creative Writing12051439
LMArena Multi-Turn12901460

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper