Model comparison
Qwen3.7 Max vs Sonar Pro
Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#42); Sonar Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
PerplexitySummary
- Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper at $2.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Sonar Pro.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Perplexity |
| Noometry Index | 51.5 | — |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | 2024-01-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $3 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | $15 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1515 | — |
| SciCode | 48.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1130 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 70.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| CritPt | 13.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 92.3% | — |
| LMCA | 44% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.68 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 34.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1490 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 55.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1488 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1484 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54), Sonar Pro: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Sonar Pro?
Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#42); Sonar Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Sonar Pro?
Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Sonar Pro lists at $3 and $15.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Sonar Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Sonar Pro has 1.