Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Sonar Pro

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#36); Sonar Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Sonar Pro Perplexity

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper at $1.30 / $7.80 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Sonar Pro.
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Sonar Pro specifications
Qwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Perplexity
Noometry Index51.1—
Released2026-04-202024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window262K200K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.30$3
Output $ / M tokens$7.80$15
Results tracked291

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50), Sonar Pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
LMArena Coding1472—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —, Sonar Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
LMArena Search—1130
Vending-Bench 24,254—

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47), Sonar Pro: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
SimpleBench63%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.1%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench87.2%—
LMCA42.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.27—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40), Sonar Pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
LMArena Math1465—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)23.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35), Sonar Pro: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
GPQA Diamond87.4%—
SimpleQA Verified52%—
LMArena Expert1476—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46), Sonar Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
LMArena Non-English1436—
LMArena Chinese1487—
LMArena French1449—
LMArena Russian1444—
LMArena Spanish1452—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51), Sonar Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1437—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59), Sonar Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
LMArena Longer Query1457—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58), Sonar Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewSonar Pro
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview better than Sonar Pro?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#36); Sonar Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Sonar Pro?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1.30 per million input tokens and $7.80 per million output tokens; Sonar Pro lists at $3 and $15.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Sonar Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29 scored results on Noometry and Sonar Pro has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper