Model comparison
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 9.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 39.8.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 524K.
Side by side
| Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 524K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.03 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.13 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 43.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 23% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 15% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.64 | — |
Math Too close to call
Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 19.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 9.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Solar Pro4?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.