Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 19.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 39.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | 43.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.