Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Plus vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.3

Rank #54 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 36.4.
  • Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Plus and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Qwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index47.337.7
Released2026-03-312025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$3$7.50
Results tracked3725

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev14611275
LMArena Coding14671413
ALE-Bench670.15461.45
SWE-bench Verified57.9%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
SciCode40.7%—
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Vending-Bench 25,115—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14491372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
NYT Connections (extended)60.3%—
CritPt2.9%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
Thematic Generalization59.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench81.9%—
LMCA33.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index147.67—

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14501364
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)38.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)26.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)8.3%—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14561337
GPQA Diamond88.4%—
SimpleQA Verified44.1%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14241345
LMArena Chinese14781356
LMArena French14541394
LMArena German14511324
LMArena Japanese13891309
LMArena Korean13811307
LMArena Russian14341367
LMArena Spanish14321360

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14251356

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14401379
CL-bench20.3%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14371356
LMArena Creative Writing14051333
LMArena Multi-Turn14381365

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Qwen3.6 Plus or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Plus and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Plus has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper