Model comparison

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 35.8.
  • Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.

Side by side

Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Nova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.347.5
Released2025-04-302026-03-31
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output10K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$12.50$3
Results tracked637

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
LMArena Coding—1467
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1449
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.65

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
Omni-MATH35%—
LMArena Math—1450
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
MMLU-Pro72.6%—
GPQA (HELM)51.8%—
LMArena Expert—1454

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1424
LMArena Chinese—1477
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1452
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1379
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
IFEval80.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1425

Long Context Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
CL-bench—20.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text—1437
LMArena Creative Writing—1404
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1438

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper