Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

33.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 54.1 to 14.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 91.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index51.533.0
Released2026-04-202024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.30—
Output $ / M tokens$7.80—
Results tracked2914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding14711235
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Vending-Bench 24,254—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14571220
SimpleBench63%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.1%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench87.2%—
LMCA42.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.24—

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%4.4%
LMArena Math14651242
MATH Level 5—42.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)23.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond87.4%46.3%
SimpleQA Verified52%—
LMArena Expert1478—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English14371236
LMArena Chinese14871249
LMArena Russian14451246
LMArena French1449—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following14381233

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14571224

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text14471256
LMArena Creative Writing14351231
LMArena Multi-Turn14561252

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper