Model comparison
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 24.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 44.7% for DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B and 87.4% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 51.5 |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.80 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 36.9 (#200), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 19.2 (#263), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | 20% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.43 | 149.24 |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |
Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 35.5 (#184), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 50.6% | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1465 |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: 24.1 (#270), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 44.7% | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1438 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1457 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 36.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.