Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen3.6 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 38.5.
- Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 42.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.60 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1425 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen3.6 27B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen3.6 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen3.6 27B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.