Model comparison
Qwen3.5 Plus vs Wizardlm 70b
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 32.2.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-02-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
| ALE-Bench | 621.92 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 0.54 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | — |
| DTBench | 80.5% | — |
| LMCA | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.78 | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 25.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 19.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 12.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5 Plus better than Wizardlm 70b?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Plus and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Plus has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.