Model comparison

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 33.4.
  • Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Phi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.042.9
Released—2026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked1715

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Coding1130—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1127—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.78

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1173—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert1108—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1094—
LMArena Chinese1108—
LMArena French1110—
LMArena German1101—
LMArena Japanese1042—
LMArena Korean954—
LMArena Russian1145—
LMArena Spanish1095—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1113—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1120—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1138—
LMArena Creative Writing1107—
LMArena Multi-Turn1088—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper