Model comparison

Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-9B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #236 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 44.0 to 35.9.
  • Qwen3.5-9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.5-9B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Qwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.845.3
Released2026-02-23—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked1017

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
SciCode27.5%—
LMArena Coding—1487

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
Terminal-Bench9.2%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
DTBench71.2%—
LMCA24.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index139.46—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions48.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202561.7%—
LMArena Math—1474

Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads

Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond79%—
LMArena Expert—1489

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.5-9B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English—1465
LMArena Chinese—1534
LMArena French—1484
LMArena German—1487
LMArena Japanese—1495
LMArena Korean—1438
LMArena Russian—1471
LMArena Spanish—1470

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.5-9B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1467

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.5-9B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1476

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.5-9B: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-9BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text—1470
LMArena Creative Writing—1464
LMArena Multi-Turn—1478

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5-9B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.5-9B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5-9B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5-9B has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper