Model comparison
Qwen3-4B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Qwen3-4B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-04-29 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 6 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 35.7% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 38.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 52.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 52.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3-4B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3-4B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-4B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.