Model comparison

Qwen Max vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-4B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-4B leads 29.7 to 22.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.1% for Qwen Max and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen Max and Qwen3-4B specifications
Qwen MaxQwen3-4B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.731.9
Released2024-04-032025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window33K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.60—
Output $ / M tokens$6.40—
Results tracked236

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
Aider Polyglot21.8%—
LMArena Coding1288—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen Max: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1269—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.1%52.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
LMArena Math1275—
MATH Level 567.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond56.1%52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1248—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1263—
LMArena Chinese1254—
LMArena French1330—
LMArena German1254—
LMArena Japanese1205—
LMArena Korean1142—
LMArena Russian1274—
LMArena Spanish1290—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1262—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
LMArena Longer Query1288—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1282—
LMArena Creative Writing1248—
LMArena Multi-Turn1277—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Max better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen3-4B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper