Model comparison
Qwen3-1.7B vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 29.7 to 15.4.
Side by side
| Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 26.2 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-04-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.4% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3-1.7B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3-1.7B and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-1.7B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.