Model comparison

Qwen2-72B vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2-72B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 5 Preview leads 51.8 to 29.1.
  • Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen2-72B and Step 5 Preview specifications
Qwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index30.047.9
Released2024-06-072026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked2618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding11961480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
WeirdML11.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct38.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete54%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
TheAgentCompany1.1%—
METR Time Horizons29.9%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts11911465
CritPt—20.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index125.28—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math12351470
ProofBench—42%
MATH Level 539.1%—

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert11711470
GPQA Diamond40.8%—
MMLU82.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen2-72B: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English11761432
LMArena Chinese12401519
LMArena Russian11691436
LMArena Spanish11691439
LMArena French1170—
LMArena German1151—
LMArena Japanese1111—
LMArena Korean1083—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following11811444

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query11921455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text12031442
LMArena Creative Writing11811410
LMArena Multi-Turn11961447

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2-72B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen2-72B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Step 5 Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper