Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Yi-1.5-34B
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 14.8.
- Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 30.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1160 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1213 |
| LMArena German | 1231 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | 1021 |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | 1091 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1139 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Yi-1.5-34B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.