Model comparison
Codestral vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 38.5 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.