Model comparison

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 49.4.

Side by side

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.845.3
Released——
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding13141487

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts12991483

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math12981474

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert12891489

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English12651465
LMArena Chinese13141534
LMArena German12311487
LMArena Japanese12071495
LMArena Russian12711471
LMArena French—1484
LMArena Korean—1438
LMArena Spanish—1470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12751467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query12921476

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text12991470
LMArena Creative Writing12621464
LMArena Multi-Turn12991478

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper