Model comparison
Qwen2.5-Max vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen2.5-Max and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.1 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Max scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 34.8.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2025-01-25 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 64.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 132.54 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 51.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1360 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 67.9% | — |
| LiveBench | 62.3% | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 58.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1369 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| Confabulations | 21.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena French | 1396 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 75.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1367 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 72.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 56.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5-Max better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen2.5-Max and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.1 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Max and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Max has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.