Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Qwen2.5-Max

Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.9 vs 40.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 25.6 to 13.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Confabulations: 14.2% for Grok 3 and 21.8% for Qwen2.5-Max.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-Max specifications
Grok 3Qwen2.5-Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.940.7
Released2025-04-092025-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Coding14321359
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—
LiveBench Coding—64.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Qwen2.5-Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5-Max leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14341360
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33132.53
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Math13911369
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
LiveBench Math—58.4%
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
Confabulations14.2%21.8%
LMArena Expert14211337
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English14101352
LMArena Chinese14481382
LMArena French14601396
LMArena German14311350
LMArena Japanese13871300
LMArena Korean13731304
LMArena Russian14161353
LMArena Spanish14171377

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following14091335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Qwen2.5-Max leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query14391358
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text14261367
LMArena Creative Writing14141339
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%72.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn14251364
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.9 vs 40.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok 3 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.9 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper