Model comparison
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | — |
| Released | 2024-09 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.17 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.70 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 46.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 7.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.44 | 112.93 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 47.7% | — |
| LMCA | 6.4% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 29.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 72.9% | 68% |
| GPQA Diamond | 35.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 34.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 74.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 73.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 7B Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.