Model comparison

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Yi-1.5-34B

Yi-1.5-34B has enough public results to be ranked (#289); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 32.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 52.2% for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and 43.8% for Yi-1.5-34B.

Side by side

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Qwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)01.AI
Noometry Index38.730.6
Released2024-092024-05-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.35—
Output $ / M tokens$1.40—
Results tracked321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
BigCodeBench Instruct39.8%33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete52.2%43.8%
LMArena Coding—1169

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1160

Math Not comparable

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math—1182
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond—32%
LMArena Expert—1144
MMLU79.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English—1121
LMArena Chinese—1213
LMArena French—1156
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005
LMArena Russian—1091
LMArena Spanish—1121

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following—1139

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query—1143

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 14B InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text—1173
LMArena Creative Writing—1135
LMArena Multi-Turn—1153

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Yi-1.5-34B has enough public results to be ranked (#289); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper