Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Codellama 34b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#287); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 52.2% for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 39.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 52.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Codellama 34b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#287); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.