Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.6 to 26.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 40.4% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 49.5% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Mistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.238.1
Released2025-06-202025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0938$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$7.50
Results tracked625

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
LMArena Coding—1412
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%49.5%
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372
Epoch Capabilities Index131.74—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530.3%—
LMArena Math—1365

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GPQA Diamond49.1%—
LMArena Expert—1338

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1346
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Russian—1366
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1355

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1357
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1255—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper