Model comparison

Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 25.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 6.7% for Mistral Small 3 and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.05 input and $0.08 output per million tokens.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.
  • Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3 and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Mistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.239.9
Released2025-01-302026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window33K1M
Max output16K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$0.13
Results tracked247

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
BigCodeBench Instruct45.3%—
LMArena Coding1246—
BigCodeBench Complete50.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
Chess Puzzles0%23%
Epoch Capabilities Index127.07144.64
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts1233—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
LMArena Math1240—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond47.3%82.3%
Confabulations25.2%—
LMArena Expert1202—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1198—
LMArena Chinese1204—
LMArena French1203—
LMArena German1211—
LMArena Japanese1111—
LMArena Korean1188—
LMArena Russian1216—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1214—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1246—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1234—
LMArena Creative Writing1195—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing707—
LMArena Multi-Turn1217—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3 lists at $0.05 and $0.08.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper