Model comparison
Mistral Small 3 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 16.3.
- Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-01-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1246 | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1233 | 1299 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.07 | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1240 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1202 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 25.2% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1198 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1204 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1211 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1188 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1214 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1246 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1234 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1195 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1217 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 707 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral Small 3 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.