Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#270); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | — |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1066 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 62.6% | 68% |
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1061 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#270); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.