Model comparison

Qwen1.5-72B vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #95 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-72B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 40.3 to 11.5.

Side by side

Qwen1.5-72B and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B specifications
Qwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.843.2
Released2024-02-042025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked2218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding11651439
BigCodeBench Instruct33.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.3%—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+61.6%—

Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts11481428

Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Math11641426

Knowledge Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert11361442
GPQA Diamond28.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen1.5-72B: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English11351405
LMArena Chinese11861463
LMArena French11591452
LMArena German10841424
LMArena Japanese10611385
LMArena Korean10501394
LMArena Russian11041408
LMArena Spanish11101428

Instruction Following Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following11411406

Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query11571420

Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Text11661420
LMArena Creative Writing11371366
LMArena Multi-Turn11601428

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5-72B better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen1.5-72B or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-72B and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-72B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper