Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Qwen1.5-72B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 40.2 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1148 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1164 |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Qwen1.5-72B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1110 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1141 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Qwen1.5-72B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.