Model comparison
Qwen1.5-72B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Qwen1.5-72B has enough public results to be ranked (#285); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | — |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1165 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 59.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1148 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1164 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1136 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1135 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1186 | — |
| LMArena French | 1159 | — |
| LMArena German | 1084 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1050 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1110 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1141 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-72B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-72B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Qwen1.5-72B has enough public results to be ranked (#285); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-72B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-72B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.