Model comparison
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#286); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1070 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#286); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.