Model comparison

Qwen1.5 4b Chat vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.3

Rank #319 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

43.8

Rank #78 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 5 Preview leads 50.6 to 28.6.
  • Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen1.5 4b Chat and Step 5 Preview specifications
Qwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index28.343.8
Released—2026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305), Step 5 Preview: 50.6 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1569
SciCode—58.9%
LMArena Coding999—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277), Step 5 Preview: 38.0 (#58)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
CritPt—20.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts976—

Math Not comparable

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233), Step 5 Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math1026—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252), Step 5 Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert980—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285), Step 5 Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English979—
LMArena Chinese1024—
LMArena German902—
LMArena Russian952—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295), Step 5 Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following979—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285), Step 5 Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query988—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304), Step 5 Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text997—
LMArena Creative Writing969—
LMArena Multi-Turn977—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5 4b Chat better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen1.5 4b Chat or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5 4b Chat and Step 5 Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper