Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 5 Preview leads 46.1 to 12.8.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Step 5 Preview specifications
Llama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
ProviderMetaStepFun
Noometry Index28.847.9
Released2024-04-182026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked3118

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding12061480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts11951465
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
CritPt—20.9%
DTBench54.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math12181470
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
ProofBench—42%
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert11491470
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU79.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English11421432
LMArena Chinese11141519
LMArena Russian11591436
LMArena Spanish12411439
LMArena French1232—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following11941444

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query11741455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text12211442
LMArena Creative Writing12101410
LMArena Multi-Turn12231447

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Step 5 Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper