Model comparison

Qwen1.5 4b Chat vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.8

Rank #322 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5 4b Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 23.8.
  • Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen1.5 4b Chat and Qwen3 Max specifications
Qwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.843.7
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding9991456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts9761448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
LMArena Math10261446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
LMArena Expert9801455
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English9791429
LMArena Chinese10241478
LMArena German9021463
LMArena Russian9521428
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following9781419

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query9881438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5 4b ChatQwen3 Max
LMArena Text9971439
LMArena Creative Writing9691402
LMArena Multi-Turn9771446

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5 4b Chat better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen1.5 4b Chat or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5 4b Chat and Qwen3 Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper