Model comparison
Qwen1.5-32B vs Yi-1.5-34B
Qwen1.5-32B and Yi-1.5-34B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-32B scores higher in 2 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 33.0 to 27.5.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | 43.8% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1130 | 1160 |
Math Qwen1.5-32B leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Yi-1.5-34B leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | 1144 |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1177 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1101 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1058 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1008 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1139 |
Long Context Too close to call
Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Yi-1.5-34B leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Qwen1.5-32B and Yi-1.5-34B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Qwen1.5-32B or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.7 vs 32.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Yi-1.5-34B share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.