Model comparison
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Yi-1.5-34B
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads 30.6 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 41.6% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
Side by side
| Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.32 | — |
| Results tracked | 43 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.9% | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | 43.8% |
| SciCode | 26% | — |
| WeirdML | 14.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 31.9% | — |
| BALROG | 23% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1160 |
| SimpleBench | 19.9% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.8% | — |
| DTBench | 59.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.33 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.6 | — |
| LiveBench | 50.2% | — |
Math Yi-1.5-34B leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1267 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | 41.6% | 25.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 5.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42.2% | — |
Knowledge Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.4% | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | 1225 | 1144 |
| Confabulations | 22.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU | 86.3% | — |
Multilingual Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1217 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1281 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1251 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1143 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1252 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1270 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1242 | 1139 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 82.7% | — |
Long Context Yi-1.5-34B leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1256 | 1143 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1280 | 1153 |
| LiveBench Language | 39.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.