Model comparison
Qwen1.5-14B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Qwen1.5-14B has enough public results to be ranked (#250); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | — |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1125 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 68.6% | 68% |
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | — |
| LMArena French | 1115 | — |
| LMArena German | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Qwen1.5-14B has enough public results to be ranked (#250); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.