Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#254); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#254); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.