Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Yi-Lightning
Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 1 category and Yi-Lightning in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-Lightning leads 50.2 to 38.0.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1312 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1302 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1300 |
Knowledge Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | 1286 |
Multilingual Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1320 |
| LMArena French | 1151 | 1305 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | 1315 |
Instruction Following Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1278 |
Long Context Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1297 |
Writing & Preference Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1311 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Yi-Lightning share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.