Model comparison
Qwen Plus vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 38.0.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2024-01-25 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | 1168 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1326 | 1185 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1206 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | 1074 |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | 1118 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | 1158 |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen Plus or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen1.5-110B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.