Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 31.2.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1185 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena French | 1151 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.