Model comparison

Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 31.2.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Qwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.239.9
Released2024-04-252026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked207

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
BigCodeBench Instruct35%—
LMArena Coding1184—
BigCodeBench Complete44.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1168—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.64
ForecastBench57.7—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1185—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
LMArena Expert1144—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1206—
LMArena French1151—
LMArena German1123—
LMArena Japanese1074—
LMArena Korean1044—
LMArena Russian1118—
LMArena Spanish1142—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1158—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1157—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1175—
LMArena Creative Writing1148—
LMArena Multi-Turn1160—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper