Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 22.4.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Qwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.934.3
Released2026-07-152026-02-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.03$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$0.13$0.80
Results tracked73

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode—32.3%
WeirdML—34.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
NYT Connections (extended)43.8%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles23%—
Mystery Game Puzzles15%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.64—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)19.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.7 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond82.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper