Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #182 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 31.2.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.238.8
Released2024-04-252026-04-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.19
Output $ / M tokens—$1.13
Results tracked2013

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
BigCodeBench Instruct35%—
LMArena Coding1184—
BigCodeBench Complete44.4%—
ALE-Bench—326.4

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
SimpleBench—35.2%
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts1168—
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—77.1%
LMCA—31%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.26
ForecastBench57.7—

Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—22.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
LMArena Math1185—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—10.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
SimpleQA Verified—15.9%
LMArena Expert1144—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1206—
LMArena French1151—
LMArena German1123—
LMArena Japanese1074—
LMArena Korean1044—
LMArena Russian1118—
LMArena Spanish1142—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1158—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1157—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

BenchmarkQwen1.5-110BQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Text1175—
LMArena Creative Writing1148—
LMArena Multi-Turn1160—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper