Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #182 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 29.0 to 22.4.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
  • Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Qwen3.6 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.834.3
Released2026-04-272026-02-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.19$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$1.13$0.80
Results tracked133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode—32.3%
WeirdML—34.4%
ALE-Bench326.4—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
SimpleBench35.2%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles20%—
Mystery Game Puzzles18%—
DTBench77.1%—
LMCA31%—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.26—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)22.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)10.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
SimpleQA Verified15.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Flash better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper