Model comparison

Qwen Turbo vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 7.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 35B-A3B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Turbo Alibaba (Qwen)

27.1

Rank #335 Reported

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.0

Rank #123 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.8 to 22.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 6.1% for Qwen Turbo and 70% for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
  • Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
  • Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen Turbo and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B specifications
Qwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.142.0
Released2024-11-012026-02-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.20$2
Results tracked328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena WebDev—1254
SciCode—29.3%
LMArena Coding—1410

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—10%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1400
DTBench—80%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.52

Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.1%70%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
LMArena Math—1404
MATH Level 556.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
GPQA Diamond41.8%83.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
LMArena Expert—1408

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English—1378
LMArena Chinese—1457
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Russian—1376
LMArena Spanish—1392

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following—1379

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query—1389

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text—1395
LMArena Creative Writing—1346
LMArena Multi-Turn—1390

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Turbo better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 7.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 35B-A3B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen Turbo or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B lists at $0.25 and $2.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Turbo and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Turbo has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper