Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen Plus vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 27.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 17.8% for Qwen Plus and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Qwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.145.3
Released2024-01-252026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$1.60
Results tracked2032

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding13281473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen Plus: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts13171460
DTBench81.1%84%
LMCA24%37.6%
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202517.8%93.3%
LMArena Math13261466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
MATH Level 565.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond48.1%87.9%
LMArena Expert13281467

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen Plus: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English13101445
LMArena Chinese13471510
LMArena Japanese12511413
LMArena Russian13231457
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13031440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query13241455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text13261455
LMArena Creative Writing12931439
LMArena Multi-Turn13361460

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

Is Qwen Plus or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper